The Sins of a Father |
Family Violence and the failure of the court system to protect the children. The Street Angel The Home Devil Despite its success and my input I learned about financial abuse – another part of Domestic Violence. He refused to give me, or even tell me what the takings were. I lost our second baby when he hit me with a baseball bat, in the stomach. Even then, despite the promises, he didn't listen to "No!" and I ended up pregnant again. I eventually closed the restaurant, lost everything and left him. But he didn't leave us. He hounded us, taking all my strength, leaving me only enough energy to survive, knowing better than to object to his decisions and whims. I was a captive of the relationship – a prisoner of his violent and cruel ways which he would mask with mass amounts of adoration and love. The merry-go-round of an abusive relationship takes more room than I have here. It's promises, the love of his queen, peace, dreams and a future. It's a child conceived in great passion, born in joy but raised in a jumbled environment of violence, anger and shame, love at a price, financial complexity too difficult to untangle and a baby's smile. You get lulled into a false sense of security because you are desperate for some peace, and you get caught again. I have been leaving him since 1994. He invades everywhere I am. He says he owns us, we are his. In his country he could kill us for leaving him. Always we are reminded he could do it here. Enter the System Again the assaults, the control went on for hours, for days, for weeks. He was not stopped by the piece of paper. It was up to me to report the breaches but just a few times could I make it to the phone. The phone became a weapon with which he bashed me. It's hard to describe that complicated, changing time – I felt almost catatonic – too powerless to even think, let alone plan, gather resources and escape yet again. Despite that piece of paper. He was disparaging of white men, white law, and particularly white women. The last time I left him was after I was hospitalised for a suspected heart attack – he had punched my chest so hard. The result – cardiac muscle trauma. I was 27 years old, very slim, strong. A karate brown belt. It doesn't matter – there is no contest – you just lose worse if you try. A Father's Rights The next breach I reported got the response from police "Have you asked him not to call?" My sense of disbelief was overwhelming – they just don't get it. All I said was "He respects nothing!" How do you even begin to explain it in the limited time they have for you? The Children - Victims of Domestic Violence, and More My Babies, Aged Two and Four The Standard of Proof While my AVO was immediately adjusted by them to include the children, the JIRT team said the child's disclosure "wouldn't be enough to stand up in court" so no criminal action would be taken. They referred the children to a child psychologist. The children violently attacked him yet he was reluctant to say the children appeared to be abused. He wasn't prepared to say the father had done it, even though the eldest was saying that he had. He seemed to have an escape clause – saying he'd seen other children who were violent for other reasons. Because of those other cases he doubted my two little boys. There were many similar sessions with various experts. Everyone had many ideas about what I might do, who I might contact. I had lists and lists of things to research, to do, people to see – everyone had advice but there is no organised, consistent process available to people like us. It nearly drove me out of my mind – the competing and never ending pressure of my two boys and their high dependency, poverty, endless attempts, costs, disappointments, failures to ring back, and always, the waiting for him to get access because the Legal System seems to value this awful right of a father – irrespective of his illegal, immoral, violent behaviour. The fear I had that he would get to see them and destroy the progress we had made was over everything. I couldn't give in – how could I betray those little boys? Challenging the Experts I have a dedicated case worker with Family Services. She has worked many long and fruitless hours on our behalf. I truly appreciate her efforts – but in the end they are not enough. Children under eight are too young to give, and defend, their evidence. I asked all the various services reps to meet together, with me. Everyone reviewed what they had done. They were very defensive. No one was prepared to try to develop a strategy that could protect my children from sexual abuse, except to suggest that I could try to prove further domestic violence (get bashed again to prove a point) and hopefully the judge MIGHT deny access for that reason. Which they admitted they thought may be highly unlikely. At the end of that meeting I was exhausted – I pointed out that at the end of the day it would again be me, alone, who would go home to my children. My violent abusive little victims of these awful crimes. Knowing no one could help them. A Bit of General Information But I kept trying. I went to their bosses in parliament. I have a caring ally there but he can't get anywhere. So the general response is "This government does not accept child abuse and has strategies in place to reflect that. Sorry they're not working for you, good luck and goodbye". Too Young Mothers should know they are always targeted – accused of being vindictive, of making false allegations "to get even". Logic doesn't matter – like why on God's Earth would we choose to live like this? And it doesn't matter which court – local, criminal, Family – each will try to divert attention from what happened by blaming the victims – the violence is only happening because of a Family Law dispute – accusations aren't real they are just a mechanism to win - it will all settle down. After a great deal of money is wasted on lawyers. That is, if you have money. The Family Court Despite my turmoil and exhaustion I know things are better for not having contact with him. The children are much calmer, much better behaved and have stopped waking – choking at night, stopped screaming from their sleep, "make him stop, make him take it out Mummy". Not so quick to grab for a knife, a stick anything to use as a weapon. Not so determined to offer their bodies to any adult then attack them when they refuse. It still happens – but far less often. The experts don't see it – they don't do home visits or video cameras. It has been hinted at heavily and threateningly that I might be coaching them. Why would I do it to myself? It seems blame the mother is easier than dealing with a cunning, sadistic paedophile. About Legal Assistance I hate the disinterest that follows hot on the heals of "No money-no help". You know the solicitor never really cared about you and your kids. They told me to give in and warned me I could go to jail if I don't let him have access. He can not turn up, change his mind, as he pleases and without sanction, but I have to get them ready, just in case. Tell me - what do I say to them? And why does he pretend he needs, and get an interpreter when he has good passes in English and often speaks publicly, a barrister and a solicitor at government expense through legal aid, when I cannot. How can the judge call me racist and demand I get counselling or risk losing the children, then gently admonish him to understand he upsets the boys if he doesn't turn up to access. You don't live with a man and have two children with him if you are racist! How can they ignore evidence of his drug use as if it does not exist? Tell me how I get past the betrayal in my boys' eyes if he rapes them again? How can I keep them safe in the face of such determination against me by the system? I feel like I'm going mad – such is my disbelief and at all these issues at once. The helping professionals are good at one thing – and that's pointing the finger at me saying "She's not coping too well!" His solicitors are seeking an injunction (restraining order) to stop me getting counselling for the children! I simply cannot believe he gets such apparent support and "my" solicitors have done nothing but frighten and demean me. I'm not the rapist! Once you need solicitors it's like being in a different world. A world where humanity is absent and the practitioners are caught up in self-interest and greed as they promise to help you. They suck out all your secrets, the shame of your life and they exploit your compassion, your morals, and your humanity. You tell them these things because you trust they care and they are on your side. It doesn't matter that you have no criminal past – you can be accused and found guilty without police investigations or without the traditional protections for those accused. At the end they have no responsibility for what they do. You can't even sue them for negligence - they say they were acting on your instructions. Peace, Understanding and Darned Good Advice If I explain a problem with the children, instead of a judgemental response I hear "Parenting is the most difficult job I've ever done too!" She hears me out. She gently offers some ideas or strategies. It's never too much bother. I feel wanted, respected, loved, appreciated, ordinary. She admires and supports my achievements; she offers sensible, assertive strategies, thinks outside the square (which is pretty important since I clearly don't fit into a neat little box). And she thinks of me and just rings to say hello and to ask whether I've taken the time to notice what a gorgeous day we're having. For me sometimes life comes breath by breath. She gives me darned good reason to live. Maybe the real difference is she knows what it is like, how complicated, how demeaning, how inappropriate the responses are for victims. Today's Test This short version of my hell on earth is unfinished. Please, lobby your state politicians to protect the children by immediate reform of the legal system to a more inquisitorial (truth seeking) model in criminal law and it's the federal politicians who are responsible for the Family law. We must have a presumption against contact where there is violence and abuse. Susan October 2002 Footnote: Cases like Susan's are easily found. The Federal Government are investigating the idea that at separation or divorce, we should start with the presumption that mother and father should each get 50/50 joint custody unless it can be shown 'why not'. Susan would have had to let the father have 50% of the parenting time with the boys. |
No comments:
Post a Comment